Proving Negligence in a New York Slip and Fall Case

Slip and fall accidents are some of the most common types of personal injury claims in New York. While these incidents might seem straightforward, proving negligence in a slip and fall case can be complex. Whether the fall occurred in a grocery store, on a sidewalk, or in a private home, understanding how to establish liability is key to securing compensation for injuries. Slip and fall cases fall under premises liability law, which holds property owners accountable for ensuring their premises are reasonably safe. To succeed in a claim, you must show that the property owner or occupier was negligent, leading to the accident.

In New York, negligence in slip and fall cases is determined by several factors. The injured party, known as the plaintiff, must prove that the property owner knew or should have known about the dangerous condition that caused the fall but failed to address it. This failure can range from not cleaning up a spill to ignoring structural defects. Additionally, the plaintiff must show that the property owner had a duty of care to maintain the premises in a safe condition. Establishing these elements in a legal claim can be challenging, but it is crucial for a successful outcome.

Understanding Duty of Care in Slip and Fall Cases

The concept of duty of care is central to any slip and fall case. Property owners in New York are legally obligated to ensure their premises are safe for visitors. This duty extends to both private and public property owners, such as homeowners, businesses, and municipal entities. For example, a grocery store owner has a responsibility to keep aisles free of debris or spills, and a homeowner must ensure that their driveway is free from dangerous conditions like ice or broken steps.

However, the extent of this duty varies depending on the relationship between the property owner and the injured party. New York law recognizes different categories of visitors: invitees, licensees, and trespassers. Invitees are people who have been invited onto the property for business purposes, such as customers in a store. Licensees are individuals who are allowed to enter the property for social reasons, like a guest at a home. Trespassers are those who enter the property without permission. Property owners owe the highest duty of care to invitees, followed by licensees. Trespassers are typically owed the least duty of care, but property owners are still required to avoid willfully causing harm.

Richard Nicotra

Founding Partner

Andrew Connelly

Managing Partner

Emily Oczytko

Associate Attorney

In slip and fall cases, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the property owner breached their duty of care. This means proving that the owner did not take reasonable steps to maintain the premises in a safe condition, resulting in the hazardous situation that caused the injury. Whether the owner’s actions (or lack thereof) constitute a breach of duty depends on various factors, including the nature of the property, the condition that caused the fall, and the owner’s awareness of the hazard.

Proving Notice of a Hazardous Condition

One of the most challenging aspects of a slip and fall case is proving that the property owner was aware of the dangerous condition. There are two types of notice that can be established in these cases: actual notice and constructive notice. Actual notice means that the property owner or their employees were directly aware of the hazard before the accident occurred. For example, if a store manager knew that a shelf had collapsed and created a tripping hazard, but failed to fix it, this would constitute actual notice.

Constructive notice, on the other hand, means that the property owner should have known about the dangerous condition, even if they were not directly informed of it. To establish constructive notice, the plaintiff must show that the hazard existed for such a length of time that a reasonable property owner would have discovered and remedied it. This is often more difficult to prove because it relies on demonstrating that the owner was negligent in inspecting and maintaining the premises. For example, if a puddle had been on a store floor for hours without being cleaned up, a court may determine that the property owner had constructive notice of the hazard.

In some cases, the plaintiff can also argue that the property owner created the dangerous condition themselves. For instance, if an employee spilled water on the floor and did not clean it up, the property owner could be held liable without the need to prove notice, since they directly caused the hazardous situation.

Richard Nicotra represented my husband for a motorcycle case. His professionalism and empathy during the case was exceptional. The professionalism Displayed by the firm and staff was truly appreciated.. I highly recommend Richard and his practice for any of your needs.”

- Lisa Isenberg

I used Andrew Connelly after I was in a car accident, and he has been my go-to for over 10 years when anyone has asked for a recommendation for a no-fault attorney. His knowledge, patience, and professionalism go a long way in making an often difficult and challenging situation easier. He is reliable, and someone you can trust to get the job done right. The 5 stars are well deserved."

- Andrea Mccarthy

Rick Nicotra from the Nicotra Law Firm PC is a very honest, knowledgeable, and genuinely caring attorney. Furthermore, he is very personable and always available for you whether it be a text, email, or phone call. Rick and his team are exceptional. They treat you like family and are second to none. I would recommend Rick Nicotra and his team from The Nicotra Law Firm PC."

- Chad

Comparative Negligence in New York Slip and Fall Cases

New York follows a comparative negligence rule in personal injury cases, including slip and fall claims. This means that even if the plaintiff is partially responsible for the accident, they may still recover damages. However, the amount of compensation they receive will be reduced by their percentage of fault. For example, if a plaintiff is found to be 30 percent at fault for their fall, they would only recover 70 percent of the total damages awarded.

In slip and fall cases, defendants often argue that the plaintiff was careless or did not take reasonable precautions to avoid the hazard. For instance, the defendant might claim that the plaintiff was not watching where they were going or was wearing inappropriate footwear. In these cases, it is crucial for the plaintiff to present evidence showing that the property owner’s negligence was the primary cause of the accident. Demonstrating that the hazardous condition was not obvious or that the plaintiff had little opportunity to avoid the danger can help mitigate any comparative negligence claims.

Gathering Evidence in a Slip and Fall Case

Proving negligence in a slip and fall case requires substantial evidence. Immediately following the accident, it is essential to document the scene and gather as much information as possible. Photographs of the hazardous condition that caused the fall, such as a broken stair, icy sidewalk, or spilled liquid, can be powerful evidence. These images can help show the severity of the hazard and how it contributed to the accident.

Eyewitness testimony can also play a significant role in proving negligence. If there were people nearby who saw the fall occur, their accounts can support the plaintiff’s claims. Witnesses can describe the condition of the property, the actions of the plaintiff, and whether the property owner or employees were aware of the hazard.

Medical records are another critical piece of evidence in slip and fall cases. These documents provide a clear account of the injuries sustained in the accident and their severity. Additionally, medical records can help establish the timeline of the injury, demonstrating that the plaintiff sought treatment soon after the fall. This is particularly important because insurance companies and defense attorneys may try to argue that the injuries were caused by something other than the slip and fall.

In many cases, testimony is also necessary to prove negligence. Professionals in fields such as engineering or safety standards can offer valuable insights into how the hazardous condition could have been prevented. Their testimony can help establish that the property owner failed to meet the standard of care required to maintain a safe environment.

Related Videos

Statute of Limitations for Slip and Fall Claims in New York

In New York, there is a limited time frame within which a slip and fall claim must be filed. This time frame is known as the statute of limitations. For personal injury cases, including slip and fall accidents, the statute of limitations is generally three years from the date of the injury. If the claim is not filed within this period, the injured party may lose their right to seek compensation.

It is important to note that there are exceptions to this rule. For example, if the slip and fall occurred on municipal property, such as a public sidewalk or park, the injured party must file a notice of claim within 90 days of the accident. This is a critical step in pursuing a lawsuit against a government entity. Additionally, the statute of limitations may be extended in cases where the injured party was a minor or mentally incapacitated at the time of the accident.

Given the complexities of slip and fall cases and the strict deadlines involved, it is essential to act quickly after an accident. Delaying legal action can result in the loss of critical evidence and reduce the chances of a successful claim.

Filing a Slip and Fall Lawsuit in New York

If negotiations with the property owner or their insurance company fail to result in a fair settlement, the injured party may need to file a lawsuit. Filing a slip and fall lawsuit in New York involves several steps, beginning with the preparation of a complaint that outlines the plaintiff’s allegations of negligence and the damages they are seeking.

Once the lawsuit is filed, both parties will engage in a discovery process, during which they exchange information and evidence related to the case. This can include depositions, requests for documents, and interrogatories. The discovery process is an essential part of building a strong case, as it allows the plaintiff to gather the evidence needed to prove negligence.

In many cases, the parties may reach a settlement before the case goes to trial. However, if a settlement cannot be reached, the case will proceed to court. During the trial, both sides will present their evidence, and a judge or jury will determine whether the property owner was negligent and to what extent the plaintiff is entitled to compensation.

Proving negligence in a New York slip and fall case requires a thorough understanding of premises liability law and a strategic approach to gathering evidence. If you have been injured in a slip and fall accident, it is essential to consult with a legal professional who can guide you through the complexities of your claim. The Nicotra Law Firm, PC is dedicated to helping individuals navigate the legal process and secure the compensation they deserve. Contact our office today to discuss your case and learn how we can assist you in holding negligent property owners accountable.